ORCHID
Phase One

The nine-month pilot that makes the full study fundable.
Pilot Proposal · $458K · Raising now





02 What Phase 1 buys
What the pilot credibly delivers
The most consequential thing Phase 1 buys
A matched comparison group, built and tested inside the pilot
Participants live through the same year as everyone else, so a before-and-after picture alone cannot separate the service from the year. Comparing each participant’s change against matched non-participants over the same window removes what happened to everyone. It also confirms that adequate matches exist for this population, and that the two groups were tracking together before the session, the assumption the full study’s headline estimate rests on. Deferring controls leaves all of that open going into the Phase 2 decision.
A working claims-linkage pipeline
Demonstrates the ability to connect an individual’s service date to medical claims data.
The first variance and effect-size estimates for this population
Our power calculation currently borrows its assumptions from other behavioral health interventions. The pilot replaces them with values measured from real linked claims, and measures the variance of the treated-versus-control difference, the parameter the full study is sized on.
A directional signal on the care shift
Utilization counts (ER visits, hospitalizations, outpatient and behavioral health visits) as the primary outcome, dollars secondary. Counts are less noisy than spending, the most likely place to see the acute to preventive shift.
A population of prospective participants (ORCHID II)
By piggybacking on the Carhart-Harris / CANOPY survey at near-zero marginal cost, we enroll early participants and prove out the recruitment channel.
03 The honest boundary
What Phase 1 will not claim
What nine months cannot settle
A specific dollar figure
A nine-month pilot is not powered to settle whether spending falls by a specific amount. Treat the directional estimate as suggestive.
What the go / no-go gate leans on
Feasibility and variance
Both are questions the pilot answers cleanly. They are what turn the Phase 2 commitment into an informed one rather than a hopeful one.
Its job is to show feasibility, fix the variance, and indicate direction, which is enough to make the Phase 2 commitment an informed one.
04 Scope of the pilot
Nine months, three moves
Recruit and consent
SEF provider network · Oregon
Roughly 300 to 400 retrospective Oregon participants. An estimated 270 to 360 link successfully to claims. The match rate is itself a feasibility finding.
Purchase one retrospective data pull
Komodo or IQVIA
A single pull covering both the pilot participants and their matched controls. ORCHID II’s separate claims pull is deferred to Phase 2, where we would negotiate from a stronger position once funding is committed.
Compare treated versus control
Utilization counts and spending
Each participant’s change from their own baseline, net of the contemporaneous change among matched controls. Up to 24 months of pre-session baseline separates genuine change from regression to the mean, reinforced by event-study trends and negative-control outcomes.
05 Investment
Fund the pilot
The pilot, including the matched comparison group. Phase 2 follows only after the go / no-go decision.
Over 3.5 years. Reconciles to the current budget with 7.5% UC Berkeley indirect.
Phase One is the gate. The full overview is the whole picture.
Keep reading.
13 slides · Phase 1 and Phase 2
Full ORCHID overview →
The problem, the study design, the focal population, the three pathways to access, the team, and the full $1.79M program.
Three pages · Print and share
Phase One as a PDF
The same proposal as a printable sheet, built to forward to a colleague or drop into a board packet.





ORCHID · Phase One · UC Berkeley · UCSF · Sheri Eckert Foundation · 2026